Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: plpython3

From: Nathan Boley <npboley(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: James William Pye <lists(at)jwp(dot)name>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plpython3
Date: 2010-02-01 20:23:21
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> I think it would be great for you to review it... I doubt that will
> cause it to get committed for 9.0, but my doubt is no reason for you
> to hold off reviewing it.

I assumed so, but the pretense of a chance will probably help to motivate me :-)

I'll have something by Thursday, and then 'Returned with Feedback'
will at least be factual.


In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2010-02-01 20:35:39
Subject: Re: plpython3
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-02-01 20:20:39
Subject: Re: Hot Standby and VACUUM FULL

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group