Re: CI and test improvements

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, samay sharma <smilingsamay(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: CI and test improvements
Date: 2023-03-15 15:57:34
Message-ID: 6b6c2853-b4e7-b3c5-5090-b882985bceb4@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 15.03.23 15:56, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> I'm surprised if there's any question about the merits of making
> documentation easily available for review. Several people have agreed;
> one person mailed me privately specifically to ask how to show HTML docs
> on cirrusci.
>
> Anyway, all this stuff is best addressed either before or after the CF.
> I'll kick the patch forward. Thanks for looking.

I suppose this depends on what you want to use this for. If your use is
to prepare and lay out as much information as possible about a patch for
a reviewer, some of your ideas make sense.

I'm using this primarily to quickly test local work in progress. So I
want a quick feedback cycle. I don't need it to show me which HTML docs
changed, for example.

So maybe there need to be different modes.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2023-03-15 16:10:14 Re: pkg-config Requires.private entries should be comma-separated
Previous Message vignesh C 2023-03-15 15:12:18 Re: Allow logical replication to copy tables in binary format