Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Windows performance again

From: "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>,"Richard Huxton" <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>,"Josep Maria Pinyol Fontseca" <jmpinyol(at)endepro(dot)com>,<pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Windows performance again
Date: 2005-12-21 18:40:09
Message-ID: 6EE64EF3AB31D5448D0007DD34EEB3417DDBA4@Herge.rcsinc.local (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
> > It's *got* to be the network configuration on the client machine.
> We've seen gripes of this sort before --- check the list archives for
> possible fixes.  I seem to recall something about a "QoS patch", as
> well as suggestions to get rid of third-party packages that might be
> interfering with the TCP stack.

I personally checked out the last report from a poster who got the issue
on win2k but not on winxp.  I ran his exact dump into my 2k server with
no problems.  This is definitely some type of local issue.

Josep: does your table have any large ( > 1k ) fields in it?


pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Michael FuhrDate: 2005-12-21 18:51:02
Subject: Re: Wrong index used when ORDER BY LIMIT 1
Previous:From: Carlos BenkendorfDate: 2005-12-21 18:16:01
Subject: ORDER BY costs

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group