| From: | "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "Pgsql-Performance" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Battery Backed Cache for RAID |
| Date: | 2005-09-14 20:17:06 |
| Message-ID: | 6EE64EF3AB31D5448D0007DD34EEB3417DD346@Herge.rcsinc.local |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 11:28:43AM -0700, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 11:25 -0700, Peter Darley wrote:
> > > I'm getting a new server for our database, and I have a quick
> question
> > > about RAID controllers with a battery backed cache. I understand
that
> the
> > > cache will allow the cache to be written out if the power fails to
the
> box,
> > > which allows it to report a write as committed safely when it's
not
> actually
> > > committed.
> >
> > Actually the cache will just hold its contents while the power is
out.
> > When the power is restored, the RAID controller will complete the
writes
> > to disk. If the battery does not last through the outage, the data
is
> > lost.
>
> Just curious: how long are the batteries supposed to last?
For the length of time it will take for you to get fired for not getting
the server running plus one hour :).
Merlin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John A Meinel | 2005-09-14 20:40:25 | Re: Battery Backed Cache for RAID |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2005-09-14 20:03:24 | Re: Battery Backed Cache for RAID |