Re: [BUGS] BUG #7534: walreceiver takes long time to detect n/w breakdown

From: Amit kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #7534: walreceiver takes long time to detect n/w breakdown
Date: 2012-09-14 13:01:37
Message-ID: 6C0B27F7206C9E4CA54AE035729E9C382853264E@szxeml509-mbs
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On Thursday, September 13, 2012 10:57 PM Fujii Masao
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 12, 2012 10:15 PM Fujii Masao
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:54 PM, <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>>>> Bug reference: 7534
>>>> Logged by: Amit Kapila
>>>> Email address: amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com
>>>> PostgreSQL version: 9.2.0
>>>> Operating system: Suse 10
>>>> Description:
>>>> 1. Both master and standby machine are connected normally,
>>>> 2. then you use the command: ifconfig ip down; make the network card of
>>>> master and standby down,
>>>> Observation
>>>> master can detect connect abnormal, but the standby can't detect connect
>>>> abnormal and show a connected channel long time.
>> I would like to implement such feature for walreceiver, but there is one
>> confusion that whether to use
>> same configuration parameter(replication_timeout) for walrecevier as for
>> master or introduce a new
>> configuration parameter (receiver_replication_timeout).

>I like the latter. I believe some users want to set the different
>timeout values,
>for example, in the case where the master and standby servers are placed in
>the same room, but cascaded standby is placed in other continent.

Thank you for your suggestion. I have implemented as per your suggestion to have separate timeout parameter for walreceiver.
The main changes are:
1. Introduce a new configuration parameter wal_receiver_replication_timeout for walreceiver.
2. In function WalReceiverMain(), check if there is no communication till wal_receiver_replication_timeout, exit the walreceiver.
This is same as walsender functionality.

As this is a feature, So I am uploading the attached patch in coming CommitFest.


With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

Attachment Content-Type Size
replication_timeout.patch text/plain 4.1 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aidan Van Dyk 2012-09-14 13:27:51 Re: Cause of recent buildfarm failures on hamerkop
Previous Message Amit kapila 2012-09-14 11:42:58 Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-09-14 13:43:16 Re: Re: Probable bug with CreateFakeRelcacheEntry (now with reproducible test case)
Previous Message Dave Page 2012-09-14 10:58:30 Re: initdb.exe changes --locale option