| From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Win32 semaphore patch |
| Date: | 2006-04-20 13:37:11 |
| Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA352D3@algol.sollentuna.se |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
In PGSemaphoreLock, should't ImmediateInterruptOK be reset in all cases?
It's not reset if we get the semaphore now. Though I won't claim to
entirely know what that flag does ;-)
(btw, I got double newlines all over)
//Magnus
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-patches-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-patches-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Qingqing Zhou
> Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 2:06 PM
> To: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: [PATCHES] Win32 semaphore patch
>
> Attached is a patch for Win32 semaphore reimplementation per
> discussion with Tom and Magnus. Basically it implements the
> interfaces defined in pg_sema.h using unnamed semaphores in
> Win32. Change in configure.in is needed to support this modification.
>
> Regards,
> Qingqing
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-04-20 14:38:36 | Re: BUG #2401: spinlocks not available on amd64 |
| Previous Message | Qingqing Zhou | 2006-04-20 12:05:49 | Win32 semaphore patch |