Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Why is CVS server so slow?

From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>,"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Michael Fuhr" <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>,"Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why is CVS server so slow?
Date: 2006-05-24 19:18:07
Message-ID: 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA0F9BB@algol.sollentuna.se (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> >> On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 08:30:36PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >>> I'm logged on daily interactively, and haven't noticed 
> any issues ...
> >
> >> Are you both referring to the same server?  I've noticed that 
> >> anoncvs.postgresql.org (66.98.251.159) has been slow for a 
> couple of 
> >> days -- it just took over five minutes to do a cvs update of HEAD 
> >> where it usually takes thirty seconds or less.
> >
> > Yeah, I was about to say the same.  The master CVS server 
> has been OK 
> > (not great, but OK) for the last week or so; but I believe 
> the folks 
> > complaining are using anoncvs.
> 
> Anyone noticing any network issues?  I just looked over the 
> server itself, swapping a *little* bit, but vmstat shows the 
> disks aren't busy ... and nothing unusual taking up CPU on 
> the server itself ...

anoncvs is on svr4, right? It's been dead slow due to spam getting
trapped in a loop because of configuration errors (see other mails with
details on what we need to do to fix that).

//Magnus

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-05-24 19:25:26
Subject: Re: Further reduction of bufmgr lock contention
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2006-05-24 19:16:23
Subject: Re: Why is CVS server so slow?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group