Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases

From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
To: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>,"Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>,"Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>,"Euler Taveira de Oliveira" <eulerto(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)br>,"Richard Huxton" <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>,"Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>,<pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases
Date: 2005-12-01 18:26:54
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-www
> > That would be fairly trivial ... let me add it to the 'todo 
> list' ... 
> > I take it that it would be safe to relegate the 
> /pub/source/OLD stuff 
> > there too?
> Not so trivial to put behind a web interface or the download 
> tracker though. Is it really necessary to have a separate 
> archive downloads site? It's not like the old ones get in the 
> way, or cost anything other than disk space on the mirrors to 
> store (and I've only ever heard mirror admins say how small 
> our site is compared to many others!).
> Plus of course, weren't we trying to reduce the number of VMs/sites?

Agreed. If we're going to keep it, just sticking it in a /old/ directory
is definitly a lot better.


pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2005-12-01 19:09:07
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] aclchk.c refactor
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2005-12-01 17:21:46
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jonah H. HarrisDate: 2005-12-01 18:45:48
Subject: Re: generalizing the planner knobs
Previous:From: Jaime CasanovaDate: 2005-12-01 18:24:20
Subject: Re: 8.1, OID's and plpgsql

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group