Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] fork/exec patch

From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers-win32" <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] fork/exec patch
Date: 2003-12-17 10:03:08
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32
> Having read through this massive thread, I concluded the 
> CONNX signal stuff is the way to go.  Where there any Win32 
> TODO items in there?  I didn't see any.

Well. There is one in the form of "make signal handlers thread-safe or
defer non-threadsafe handlers".
But before we're committed down that path, I think we need someone with
really good knowledge in those signal handlers to comment on wether this
sounsd reasonable at all, or if it iwll be too much work. I know I don't
have that knowledge, and from what I read we've had nobody speak up yet.

Basically, we want signal handlers to run on a separate thread from the
main processing.



pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2003-12-17 12:47:53
Subject: Pipes vs Events
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2003-12-17 02:23:03
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UTF support in WIN32 native and Lower/Upper in 7.5 release

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group