Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> No, at least both pgbouncer and pgpool consider only (username, database)
> pair as pool identifier. Rest of the startup params are tuned on the fly.
> And I think that should stay that way.
If you're happy with handling the existing connection parameters in a given
way, why would you not want application_name behaving that same way?
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2009-12-01 20:32:07|
|Subject: Re: Block-level CRC checks|
|Previous:||From: Marko Kreen||Date: 2009-12-01 20:07:06|
|Subject: Re: Application name patch - v4|