Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Charset/collate support and function parameters

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Charset/collate support and function parameters
Date: 2004-10-30 18:42:58
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org> writes:
> On Sat, 30 Oct 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Why would we not keep this information right in the string values?

> We could, but then we would need to parse it every time.

Huh?  We'd store it in the most compact pre-parsed form we could think
of; probably some sort of index into a list of supported character sets
and collations.  (This is not so different from representing timezones
inside timestamptz values, instead of using a global setting.)

> Are you worried about performance or is it the smaller change that you
> want?

I'm worried about the fact that instead of, say, one length(text)
function, we would now have to have a different one for every
characterset/collation.  Not to mention one for every possible N in
varchar(N).  Making those properties part of a function's parameter
signature is unworkable on its face --- it'll cause an exponential
explosion in the number of pg_proc entries, and probably make it
impossible to resolve a unique candidate function in many situations.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2004-10-30 19:07:30
Subject: Re: 8.0b4: COMMIT outside of a transaction echoes ROLLBACK
Previous:From: Dennis BjorklundDate: 2004-10-30 18:32:13
Subject: Re: Charset/collate support and function parameters

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group