Re: Improving backend startup interlock

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Giles Lean <giles(at)nemeton(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Improving backend startup interlock
Date: 2002-09-29 01:47:59
Message-ID: 6768.1033264079@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Giles Lean <giles(at)nemeton(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> Is there some reason that file locking is not acceptable? Is there
> any platform or filesystem supported for use with PostgreSQL which
> doesn't have working exclusive file locking?

How would we know? We have never tried to use such a feature.

For sure I would not trust it on an NFS filesystem. (Although we
disparage running an NFS-mounted database, people do it anyway.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-09-29 02:00:49 Re: DROP COLUMN misbehaviour with multiple inheritance
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-09-29 01:23:31 Re: 7.2.3?