Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> OK, so I should split this into 2 patches?
> Even without the compression, it's probably worth the 16 -> 10 byte
> reduction that would result from removing the 2nd CTID in the UPDATE
> case, and that part would be a pretty small patch.
Yeah, my point exactly. The rest of it might or might not be worth the
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2011-08-01 20:02:39|
|Subject: Re: [RFC] Common object property boards|
|Previous:||From: Dean Rasheed||Date: 2011-08-01 19:48:07|
|Subject: Re: Compressing the AFTER TRIGGER queue|