Re: [PROPOSAL] Temporal query processing with range types

From: Peter Moser <pitiz29a(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Anton Dignös <anton(dot)dignoes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Temporal query processing with range types
Date: 2020-01-30 15:00:27
Message-ID: 670d47c9-77e0-702e-721d-0dbaa709f25d@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Hackers,

On 12/1/19 4:45 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> For now I have moved the patch to
> next CF, waiting on author.

We have withdrawn this patch for now. The reason for this is, that we
had ideas on how to split it into multiple simpler independent patches,
that can be reviewed and committed one by one.

Best regards,
Anton and Peter

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dmitry Dolgov 2020-01-30 15:34:33 Re: SimpleLruTruncate() mutual exclusion
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2020-01-30 14:35:38 Re: [PATCH] Fix PostgreSQL 12.1 server build and install problems under MSYS2