Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: TODO: Add a GUC to control whether BEGIN inside

From: "Gurjeet Singh" <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "PGSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: TODO: Add a GUC to control whether BEGIN inside
Date: 2007-01-02 18:04:46
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 1/2/07, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> E.g., no GUC parameter. Just change the behavior or don't.
Please refer the conversation beginning at:

That is where this TODO item came from. In the conversation, it was
understood that such a change would break many applications, hence one of
the option was to introduce a GUC var and keep it on by default, and a
couple of releases later, remove the GUC and make the behaviour default (

This would help the programmers can realize that they are doing something
wrong, and they can make appropriate changes to their code.

The usability of the GUC comes in a production environment, where it is not
possible to change the application. The DBA can buy some time by turning the
GUC var off.

I submitted a patch, which was incorrect and incomplete as I was _very_ new
to PGSQL. I could not follow up on it as I was switching jobs at the time.

Tom objected to the default=ON setting for the GUC.

The TODO has been declared "misconceived", but I guess there's still
interest out here. Would like to finish it once we reach a consensus.

Best regards,

singh(dot)gurjeet(at){ gmail | hotmail | yahoo }.com

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: David BorehamDate: 2007-01-02 18:20:20
Subject: Re: TODO: GNU TLS
Previous:From: Jeff DavisDate: 2007-01-02 17:48:22
Subject: Re: Sync Scan update

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group