Re: Something's been bugging me

Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> The idea that I recall mentioning was to expend another byte in TOAST
>> pointers to make them self-identifying, ie, instead of 0x80 or 0x01
>> signaling something that *must* be a 17-byte toast pointer, that bit
>> pattern signals "something else" and the content of the next byte
>> lets you know what. So TOAST pointers would take 18 bytes instead of
>> 17, and there would be room for additions of other sorts of pointers.

> Here's a patch that does all of the above.

I'd be inclined to make the second byte be the length and have
VARSIZE_1B_E depend on that --- any objection?

> 2) the test in tuptoaster.c could be

> if (toast_isnull[i] ||
> !VARATT_IS_EXTERNAL(new_value) ||
> VARSIZE_EXTERNAL(old_value) != VARSIZE_EXTERNAL(new_value) ||
> memcmp(VARDATA_SHORT(old_value),
> VARDATA_SHORT(new_value),
> VARSIZE_EXTERNAL(old_value)) != 0)

Yeah, I'd go with this just to avoid having hardwired knowledge of the
datum size here.

regards, tom lane