Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>,Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch
Date: 2005-08-14 16:58:55
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I removed the separate pg_file_length() function, as it doesn't have any
>> significant notational advantage anymore; you can do

> Please note that there are pg_file_length functions in use for 8.0 on 
> probably >95 % of win32 installations, so you're breaking backwards 
> compatibility.

What backwards compatibility?  Bruce already renamed several of these

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-08-14 17:02:54
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Proposed: Have SPI_connect fail if there is no current snapshot
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-08-14 16:56:06
Subject: Re: PATCH to allow concurrent VACUUMs to not lock each

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group