Re: [PATCH] New [relation] option engine

From: Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] New [relation] option engine
Date: 2023-12-08 05:10:29
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

11.11.2023 12:33, John Naylor пишет:
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 10:03 AM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 at 14:49, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
>>> On 2023-Jan-31, vignesh C wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 18:38, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> There has been no updates on this thread for some time, so this has
>>>> been switched as Returned with Feedback. Feel free to open it in the
>>>> next commitfest if you plan to continue on this.
>>> Well, no feedback has been given, so I'm not sure this is a great
>>> outcome. In the interest of keeping it alive, I've rebased it. It
>>> turns out that the only conflict is with the 2022 -> 2023 copyright line
>>> update.
>>> I have not reviewed it.
>> Since there was no response to rebase the patch, I was not sure if the
>> author was planning to continue. Anyways Nikolay Shaplov plans to work
>> on this soon, So I have added this to the next commitfest at [1].
>> [1] -
> Nine months have passed, and there hasn't been an update since last
> time it was returned. It doesn't seem to have been productive to
> resurrect it to the CF based on "someone plans to work on it soon".
> I'm re-returning it with feedback.
> Some time ago, there was a proposal to create a new category "lack of
> interest", but that also seems to have gone nowhere because of...lack
> of interest.

I've rebased patch, so it could be add to commitfest again.

Yura Sokolov

Attachment Content-Type Size
v5-0001-New-options-engine.patch text/x-patch 198.7 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2023-12-08 05:17:42 Re: Make COPY format extendable: Extract COPY TO format implementations
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2023-12-08 05:02:08 Re: Memory consumed by paths during partitionwise join planning