Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Indexing for geographic objects?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Ansley <Michael(dot)Ansley(at)intec-telecom-systems(dot)com>
Cc: "'Franck Martin '" <franck(at)sopac(dot)org>, "'pgsql-general '" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "'pgsql-hackers '" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "'t(dot)h(dot)p(dot)ansley(at)durham(dot)co(dot)uk'" <t(dot)h(dot)p(dot)ansley(at)durham(dot)co(dot)uk>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Indexing for geographic objects?
Date: 2000-11-27 03:32:41
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
Michael Ansley <Michael(dot)Ansley(at)intec-telecom-systems(dot)com> writes:
> Remember also that the GiST library has been integrated into PG, (my brother
> is doing some thesis workon that at the moment),

Yeah?  Does it still work?

Since the GIST code is not tested by any standard regress test, and is
so poorly documented that hardly anyone can be using it, I've always
assumed that it is probably suffering from a severe case of bit-rot.

I'd love to see someone contribute documentation and regression test
cases for it --- it's a great feature, if it works.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2000-11-27 03:54:38
Subject: pg_relcheck
Previous:From: Franck MartinDate: 2000-11-26 23:06:21
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Indexing for geographic objects?

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: GHDate: 2000-11-27 04:04:31
Subject: Postgres and AOLServer
Previous:From: GHDate: 2000-11-27 03:28:33
Subject: Re: Bug? 'psql -l' in pg_ctl?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group