| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joel Stevenson <joelstevenson(at)mac(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: LISTEN / NOTIFY performance in 8.3 |
| Date: | 2008-02-24 18:57:48 |
| Message-ID: | 6092.1203879468@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Joel Stevenson <joelstevenson(at)mac(dot)com> writes:
>> This sounds a bit like pg_listener has gotten bloated. Try a "VACUUM
>> VERBOSE pg_listener" (as superuser) and see what it says.
> At the moment (server is inactive):
> pcdb=# VACUUM VERBOSE pg_listener;
> INFO: vacuuming "pg_catalog.pg_listener"
> INFO: "pg_listener": removed 1 row versions in 1 pages
> INFO: "pg_listener": found 1 removable, 21 nonremovable row versions
> in 28 pages
OK, that destroys the table-bloat theory. Just to make sure, I
pre-populated pg_listener with enough dead rows to make 28 pages,
but I still don't see any slow notifies or noticeable load in vmstat.
That server is not quite "inactive", though. What are the 21 remaining
pg_listener entries for? Is it possible that those jobs are having
some impact on the ones run by the test script?
Also, it might be worth enabling log_lock_waits to see if the slow
notifies are due to having to wait on some lock or other.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-02-24 19:10:25 | Re: Weird issue with planner choosing seq scan |
| Previous Message | Sean Leach | 2008-02-24 18:41:26 | Re: Weird issue with planner choosing seq scan |