Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Lou Picciano <loupicciano(at)comcast(dot)net>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?
Date: 2010-03-05 20:56:28
Message-ID: 603c8f071003051256o6b9f9eban6d61afa6449aa6d@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> By splitting out the doc building into a separate target, we will have
> less users installing the documentation.

I don't see why. And even if it's true, it just means some people
were installing the docs "by accident" before even though they didn't
really want them.

...Robert

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-03-05 20:57:53 Re: BUG #5348: Postgres crashes with index on xpath_string
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-03-05 20:53:41 Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?