Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: visibility maps and heap_prune

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: visibility maps and heap_prune
Date: 2010-02-26 03:47:23
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> > Whatever happened to this? ?It was in the first 9.0 commitfest but was
>> > returned with feedback but never updated:
>> >
>> > ? ? ? ?
>> Well, the patch author chose not to pursue it.  It's clearly far too
>> late now, at least for 9.0.
>> I'm pleased to see that you're not finding many patches that just
>> completely slipped through the cracks - seems like most things were
>> withdrawn on purpose, had problems, and/or were not pursued by the
>> author.  I think the CommitFest process has done a pretty good job of
>> making sure everything gets looked at.  The only small chink I see is
>> that there may be some patches (especially small ones or from
>> first-time contributors) which escaped getting added to a CommitFest
>> in the first place; and we don't really have a way of policing that.
>> Usually someone replies to the patch author and suggests adding it to
>> the next CF, but I can't swear that that happens in every case.
> Yea, the complex issues are often lost, and I stopped tracking
> commitfest items so I don't actually know if anything that got into the
> commit fest was eventually just dropped by the author.  We can say we
> don't need to persue those but they might be valuable/important.

Yes, they could be valuable/important - anything that falls into that
category is probably going to turn into a TODO list item at this


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jaime CasanovaDate: 2010-02-26 03:50:35
Subject: Re: Allow vacuumdb to only analyze
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-02-26 03:40:35
Subject: Re: Avoiding bad prepared-statement plans.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group