Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCH] Provide rowcount for utility SELECTs

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Hans-Juergen Schoenig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Provide rowcount for utility SELECTs
Date: 2010-02-11 19:42:49
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Robert Haas escribió:
>> I was all prepared to admit that I hadn't actually looked at the patch
>> carefully enough, but I just looked at (and CVS HEAD) again and what
>> you've written here doesn't appear to describe what I'm seeing in the
>> code:
>>                               if ((portal->strategy != PORTAL_ONE_SELECT) && (!portal->holdStore))
>>                                       FillPortalStore(portal, isTopLevel);
>> So one of us is confused... it may well be me.
> Ah, it seems I misread it ... but then I don't quite see the point in
> that change.

Well the point is just that Zoltan is adding some more code that
applies to both branches of the switch, so merging them saves some

> Well, not doing a full review anyway, so never mind me.

Actually I was sort of hoping you (or someone other than me) would
pick this up for commit...


In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Garick HamlinDate: 2010-02-11 19:45:13
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make standby server continuously retry restoring the next WAL
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-02-11 19:40:51
Subject: Re: log_error_verbosity function display

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group