Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Add on_trusted_init and on_untrusted_init to plperl UPDATED [PATCH]

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Add on_trusted_init and on_untrusted_init to plperl UPDATED [PATCH]
Date: 2010-02-03 14:55:11
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hey! I don't think were quite to that nasty B word yet :)  I would
> argue that treating plperl and plperlu as the same language just
> because it shares the same code is a mistake.  But I hate the idea of
> two custom_variable_classes for plperl(u) as well.  Which is why I
> quickly switched to plperl.on_plperl(u)_init.  Any thoughts on those?
> Again maybe people think the original names are fine... *shrug*.

I like plperl.on_plperl(u)_init better than plperl.on_(un)trusted_init.


In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2010-02-03 14:59:10
Subject: Partial Page Writes documentaiton mention
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-02-03 14:53:04
Subject: Re: Review of Writeable CTE Patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group