On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 4:09 AM, Marko Tiikkaja
> On 2010-02-03 11:04 UTC+2, Takahiro Itagaki wrote:
>> Hi, I'm reviewing the writable CTE patch. The code logic seems to be
>> pretty good, but I have a couple of comments about error cases:
>> * Did we have a consensus about user-visible "DML WITH" messages?
>> The term is used in error messages in many places, for example:
>> "DML WITH without RETURNING is only allowed inside an unreferenced CTE"
>> Since we don't use "DML WITH" nor "CTE" in documentation,
>> I'd like to avoid such technical acronyms in logs if we had better names,
>> or we should have a section to explain them in docs.
> We have yet to reach a consensus on the name for this feature. I don't
> think we have any really good candidates, but I like "DML WITH" best so far.
Why can't we complain about the actual SQL statement the user issued?
INSERT requires RETURNING when used within a referenced CTE
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Andres Freund||Date: 2010-02-03 14:19:49|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Faster CREATE DATABASE by delaying fsync (was 8.4.1
ubuntu karmic slow createdb)|
|Previous:||From: Michael Meskes||Date: 2010-02-03 13:57:19|
|Subject: Re: NaN/Inf fix for ECPG Re: out-of-scope cursor errors|