On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 12:23 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Two months on, there is
>> zero sign of any activity on that front
> I'm surprised that you call 14 commits in 28 days following a publicly
> available priority list: "zero sign of activity".
> Further discussion seems pointless.
Wow, that was an awesome way to quote what I said out of context and
make it sound like I said something ridiculous. The problem I and
others have is not with the quantity of your commits but with the
issues you are choosing (not) to address.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-01-29 18:36:20|
|Subject: Re: [BUG?] strange behavior in ALTER TABLE ... RENAME TO on inherited columns|
|Previous:||From: Joshua D. Drake||Date: 2010-01-29 18:14:19|
|Subject: Re: Hot Standby: Relation-specific deferred conflict