Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Review: listagg aggregate

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Review: listagg aggregate
Date: 2010-01-28 14:17:00
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> simplest could not be a best. There have to be only a const
> expression. But we have not possibility to check it in pg.

Well... that's an entirely arbitrary limitation.  I admit that it
doesn't seem likely that someone would want to have a variable
delimiter, but putting extra effort and code complexity into
preventing it seems pointless.


In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2010-01-28 14:22:01
Subject: Re: Add on_perl_init and proper destruction to plperl [PATCH]
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-01-28 14:13:48
Subject: Re: CommitFest status summary 2010-01-27

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group