| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [BUG?] strange behavior in ALTER TABLE ... RENAME TO on inherited columns |
| Date: | 2010-01-27 14:29:06 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f071001270629k463e6e3dha56f8711c49e1001@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2010/1/27 KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>:
> The attached patch is revised one based on the V3 approach.
> The only difference from V3 is that it also applies checks on the
> AT_AlterColumnType option, not only renameatt().
I think I was clear about what the next step was for this patch in my
previous email, but let me try again.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-01/msg02407.php
See also Tom's comments here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-01/msg00110.php
I don't believe that either Tom or I are prepared to commit a patch
based on this approach, at least not unless someone makes an attempt
to do it the other way and finds an even more serious problem. If
you're not interested in rewriting the patch along the lines Tom
suggested, then we should just mark this as Returned with Feedback and
move on.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hitoshi Harada | 2010-01-27 14:32:08 | Re: Improving the accuracy of estimate_num_groups() |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-01-27 14:21:47 | Re: Add on_perl_init and proper destruction to plperl [PATCH] |