Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Streaming replication, loose ends

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Streaming replication, loose ends
Date: 2010-01-15 17:24:11
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> Uh, do we really want to call this "replication" rather than archive log
>> streaming or something.  It seems "replication" is a generic term and
>> will confuse people who are using other replication solutions like
>> Slony.
> +1, it is not replication. I would call it something like continuous
> archiving or streaming pitr

Of course "PITR" does stand for "point-in-time replication"...


In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Stefan KaltenbrunnerDate: 2010-01-15 17:24:58
Subject: Re: Streaming replication status
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2010-01-15 17:17:38
Subject: Re: Streaming replication, loose ends

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group