| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: damage control mode |
| Date: | 2010-01-12 17:52:20 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f071001120952v7a5d715cr3651a7d972b8d108@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Dimitri Fontaine
<dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I agree. My main concern in terms of dealing with these outstanding
>> is that it will distract us, particularly Tom, from stabilizing the
>> tree, especially HS, VF, and SR. If the tree were in a releasable
>> state today I wouldn't be worrying about it.
>
> You sound like you want to drop the last Commit Fest and prepare beta
> instead.
I think I was pretty clear about what I was proposing in the message
with which I started this thread - bump some or all the big,
outstanding patches to leave more time for stabilizing the tree.
Almost everyone said "no". That's the community's decision and I
accept it, but IMHO it's a tacit decision to slip the release.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2010-01-12 17:56:25 | Re: damage control mode |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-01-12 17:48:50 | Re: NOT NULL violation and error-message |