On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 7:29 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 19:45 +0900, Takahiro Itagaki wrote:
>> I used "VACUUM FULL" because we were discussing to drop VFI completely,
>> but I won't replace the behavior if hot-standby can support VFI.
> HS can't support VFI now, by definition. We agreed to spend the time
> getting rid of VFI, which working on this with you is part of.
> If we can just skip the index rebuild, I think that's all the additional
> code changes we need. I'll improve the docs as I review-to-commit.
So, what is the roadmap for getting this done? It seems like to get
rid of VFI completely, we would need to implement something like what
Tom described here:
I'm not sure whether the current patch is a good intermediate step
towards that ultimate goal, or whether events have overtaken it.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2009-12-28 16:50:02|
|Subject: psql 8.4 \c repeats version banner|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2009-12-28 16:31:13|
|Subject: Re: Removing pg_migrator limitations|