On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Caleb Welton <cwelton(at)greenplum(dot)com> writes:
>> I believe the int2vectorin function should handle invalid input more cleanly.
> Why bother? Under what circumstances would users (or anyone at all)
> be putting data into an int2vector? It's an internal type and is
> certainly not meant for use in user tables.
Maybe it's just me, but this seems like an unnecessarily dismissive
response to a report of some rather odd-looking behavior.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Joshua Tolley||Date: 2009-12-02 03:53:49|
|Subject: Re: PL/Python array support|
|Previous:||From: Caleb Welton||Date: 2009-12-02 03:52:29|
|Subject: Re: [PATCH] bugfix for int2vectorin |