From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Brahma Prakash Tiwari <brahma(dot)tiwari(at)inventum(dot)cc> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Why age (datfrozenxid) in postgres becomes 1073742202 not zero after each vacuum of database. |
Date: | 2009-11-13 21:05:38 |
Message-ID: | 603c8f070911131305t1fc446fcw13df71b67da9093@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jobs pgsql-performance |
[ removing -jobs from cc list as it is not appropriate for this posting ]
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 3:18 AM, Brahma Prakash Tiwari
<brahma(dot)tiwari(at)inventum(dot)cc> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Why age (datfrozenxid) in postgres becomes 1073742202 not zero after vacuum
> of database.
>
> Thanks in advance
I think you're misunderstanding the meaning of the column. As the
fine manual explains:
"Similarly, the datfrozenxid column of a database's pg_database row is
a lower bound on the normal XIDs appearing in that database — it is
just the minimum of the per-table relfrozenxid values within the
database."
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/routine-vacuuming.html
...Robert
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Megan Mario | 2009-11-17 20:27:02 | PostgreSQL DBA opening, for post - thank you! |
Previous Message | kirk Baillie | 2009-11-12 18:11:44 | Contract Web Architect Opportunity in Portland, Oregon |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Smith | 2009-11-13 21:06:20 | Re: SSD + RAID |
Previous Message | Fernando Hevia | 2009-11-13 20:57:38 | Re: SSD + RAID |