Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING
Date: 2009-09-29 16:32:56
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Marko Tiikkaja escribió:
>> Robert Haas wrote:
>> >So I think we should at a minimum ask the patch author to (1) fix the
>> >explain bugs I found and (2) update the README, as well as (3) revert
>> >needless whitespace changes - there are a couple in execMain.c, from
>> >the looks of it.
>> In the attached patch, I made the changes to explain as you
>> suggested and reverted the only whitespace change I could find from
>> execMain.c. However, English isn't my first language so I'm not very
>> confident about fixing the README.
> BTW what was the conclusion of the idea about having three separate
> nodes Insert, Delete, Update instead of a single Dml node?

It wasn't obvious from reading the patch why multiple node types would
be superior; but I'm not 100% sure I understand what Tom had in mind,


In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: kunal sharmaDate: 2009-09-29 16:35:23
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Postgres server goes in recovery mode repeteadly
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-09-29 16:28:03
Subject: Re: Postgres server goes in recovery mode repeteadly

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group