Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch
Date: 2009-08-10 01:57:31
Message-ID: 603c8f070908091857p760103abx63c81116f0a48659@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 9:36 PM, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> I'm going to mark the patch Waiting on Author, since it's not close
>>> to being committable until these issues are resolved.
>
>> Is it realistic to think that this will be finished and committed this week?
>
> I didn't want to prejudge that question.  We still have the rest of the
> week, and there's not that much else left to do, at least from my
> standpoint (some of the other committers still have stuff on their
> plates).

Fair point, my impatience is showing. Sorry.

...Robert

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Williams 2009-08-10 02:01:07 Re: Review: Patch for contains/overlap of polygons
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-08-10 01:47:59 Re: machine-readable explain output v4