Re: need more reviewers for index changes

On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 6:40 AM, Stephen Frost<sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> Robert,
>
> * Robert Haas (robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
>> It probably makes sense to start with indexam api changes, since the
>> other one depends on that one.
>
> I've looked the patch over, but the problem is that the patch doesn't do
> terribly much by itself, and Tom's already commented on things he
> doesn't like about it.  Alot of the patch here:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4A5ADFE6.6060507@enterprisedb.com
> is changing heap_hot_search_buffer to have heapTuple passed in as a
> pointer rather than a local var, which makes for many '.' to '->'
> changes.  The rest is just splitting index_getnext into two pieces.

Ah, yes, I see your point. So I think this is actually waiting on
author. We should poke Heikki.

...Robert