| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, sysadmins <sysadmins(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [sysadmins] List moderation - need a break! |
| Date: | 2009-06-16 04:35:58 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f070906152135w4a6e1175m5a156c3f54b5b91e@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Marc G. Fournier<scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Dave Page wrote:
>
>>
>> Yes - that was what I thought everyone agreed. Otherwise, I just end
>> up having to approve potentially dozens of messages if a thread
>> crosses over from somewhere else.
>
> Done:
>
> configset pgsql-www restrict_post <<ENDAAB
> GLOBAL:
> ENDAAB
Forgive me for asking, but is this also set up this way for
pgsql-hackers and pgsql-bugs? Threads are frequently cross-posted
between the two, and ISTM I've had problems with stalled posts to
-bugs in the not-too-distant past.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-06-16 05:56:49 | Re: [sysadmins] List moderation - need a break! |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2009-06-16 01:52:02 | Re: [sysadmins] List moderation - need a break! |