Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Scalability in postgres

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Scott Carey <scott(at)richrelevance(dot)com>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Dimitri <dimitrik(dot)fr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Flavio Henrique Araque Gurgel <flavio(at)4linux(dot)com(dot)br>, Fabrix <fabrixio1(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, James Mansion <james(at)mansionfamily(dot)plus(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Scalability in postgres
Date: 2009-06-03 18:39:04
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Scott Carey <scott(at)richrelevance(dot)com> wrote:
> Postgres could fix its connection scalability issues -- that is entirely
> independent of connection pooling.

Really?  I'm surprised.  I thought the two were very closely related.
Could you expand on your thinking here?


In response to


pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Erik AronestyDate: 2009-06-03 19:30:30
Subject: Re: degenerate performance on one server of 3
Previous:From: DimitriDate: 2009-06-03 18:13:39
Subject: Re: Scalability in postgres

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group