On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> There's another issue which is that of the $Id$ and similar tags. We
>> have to decide what we want to do with them. If we're not going to have
>> them in the Git repository, then they are only causing trouble right now
>> and it would be better to get rid of them completely for the conversion,
>> to avoid the noise that they will invariably cause.
> What was in the back of my mind was that we'd go around and mass-remove
> $PostgreSQL$ (and any other lurking tags), but only from HEAD and only
> after the repo conversion. Although just before it would be okay too.
> The stickier part of this is what to do about back branches;
> particularly whether we are okay with checked-out versions of past
> releases not matching the actual shipped tarballs on this point.
Mass-deleting these tags from HEAD and the current head of each
back-branch seems like a good place to start.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2009-05-28 16:58:04|
|Subject: Re: Clean shutdown and warm standby|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2009-05-28 16:51:06|
|Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up |