Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: contrib function naming, and upgrade issues

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: contrib function naming, and upgrade issues
Date: 2009-03-21 02:42:29
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:57 PM, Andrew Gierth
<andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> wrote:
> Note that I'm talking here about the names of the C functions, not
> the SQL names.
> The existing hstore has some very dubious choices of function names
> (for non-static functions) in the C code; functions like each(),
> delete(), fetchval(), defined(), tconvert(), etc. which all look to me
> like prime candidates for name collisions and consequent hilarity.
> The patch I'm working on could include fixes for this; but there's an
> obvious impact on anyone upgrading from an earlier version... is it
> worth it?

Based on that description, +1 from me.  That kind of hilarity can be a
huge time sink when debugging, and it makes it hard to use grep to
find all references to a particular function (or #define, typedef,


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2009-03-21 03:50:15
Subject: Re: small but useful patches for text search
Previous:From: Bryce CuttDate: 2009-03-21 02:22:20
Subject: Re: Proposed Patch to Improve Performance of Multi-BatchHash Join for Skewed Data Sets

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group