Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: xpath processing brain dead

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: xpath processing brain dead
Date: 2009-02-26 18:51:14
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> What I have proposed for 8.3 should not break a single case that currently
> behaves usefully. If anyone has a counter-example please show it.
> What I have proposed for 8.4 possibly would break current "useful" behaviour
> (FSVO "useful"), but should be done anyway on correctness grounds.

I dunno, aren't XML document fragments sort of a pretty common case?


In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: KaiGai KoheiDate: 2009-02-26 19:02:07
Subject: Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1608)
Previous:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2009-02-26 18:38:33
Subject: Re: Hot standby, recovery infra

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group