Re: Contributor List policy

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, bruce(at)momjian(dot)us, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Subject: Re: Contributor List policy
Date: 2008-03-11 01:55:08
Message-ID: 6028.1205200508@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> ... there should be two lists, of which you
> would definitely be label'd a 'Major Contributor' ...

I've been thinking that for awhile. Core is in a good position to see
who are major or minor code contributors, but we are not so well placed
to see who's contributing in a non-code fashion. If there's going to
be recognition for non-code contributions I'd be happy to see that be a
separate list managed by someone else. How this all gets presented on
the website (one page or several?) is not clear.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dan Langille 2008-03-11 01:59:49 Re: Contributor List policy
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2008-03-11 01:47:06 Re: Contributor List policy