"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>>> /contrib move to pgfoundry
> Well pgFoundry isn't ready to have a load of code that is
> that actively maintained put on it. It still needs to be moved to
> its new servers.
The modules proposed to be moved out aren't actively maintained now;
if they were we'd probably be keeping them in core.
> Also we should probably seriously consider which contrib modules
> get moved.
You seem to have forgotten the discussion entirely. These are
the modules proposed to be moved:
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2005-09-26 17:45:31|
|Subject: Re: On Logging |
|Previous:||From: Andreas Pflug||Date: 2005-09-26 17:30:48|
|Subject: Re: On Logging|