Re: Insert performance vs Table size

From: Jacques Caron <jc(at)directinfos(dot)com>
To: "Praveen Raja" <praveen(dot)raja(at)netlight(dot)se>
Cc: <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Insert performance vs Table size
Date: 2005-06-27 11:40:13
Message-ID: 6.2.0.14.0.20050627133508.05df6eb0@pop.interactivemediafactory.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hi,

At 13:24 27/06/2005, Praveen Raja wrote:
>I'm wondering if and how the size of a table affects speed of inserts
>into it? What if the table has indexes, does that alter the answer?

Many parameters will affect the result:
- whether there are any indexes (including the primary key, unique
constraints...) to update or not
- whether there are any foreign keys from or to that table
- the size of the rows
- whether the table (or at least the bits being updated) fit in RAM or not
- whether the table has "holes" (due to former updates/deletes and vacuum)
and how they are placed
- and probably a bunch of other things...

Obviously, if you have an append-only (no updates, no deletes) table with
no indexes and no foreign keys, the size of the table should not matter
much. As soon as one of those conditions is not met table size will have an
impact, probably small as long as whatever is needed can be held in RAM, a
lot bigger once it's not the case.

Hope that helps,

Jacques.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-06-27 11:45:19 Re: COPY FROM performance improvements
Previous Message 李江华 2005-06-27 11:30:50 Re: Insert performance vs Table size