Re: Hub.org DNS

From: "Gavin M(dot) Roy" <gmr(at)ehpg(dot)net>
To: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hub.org DNS
Date: 2006-12-12 19:58:49
Message-ID: 5b599cc10612121158p2788e86al292d5a8f66b169d@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

for borg and related, you can use 216.218.206.51/216.218.206.34 for
resolution if needed, on the same local net.

On 12/11/06, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
> > Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >> 'k, unless I've missed somethign here, I've just checked all 4 name
> >> servers, and they all have:
> >>
> >> options {
> >> allow-recursion {huborg;};
> >> };
> >>
> >> acl huborg {
> >> 200.46.204.0/24;
> >> 200.46.208.0/24;
> >> 206.223.169.0/24;
> >> };
> >>
> >> Something else I need to add?
> >
> > Per our conversation on IM earlier,
> >
> > Name: svr4.postgresql.org
> > Address: 66.98.251.159
> >
> > Name: svr2.postgresql.org
> > Address: 65.19.161.90
> >
> > Name: borg.postgresql.org
> > Address: 65.19.161.2
> >
> > Name: wwwmaster.postgresql.org
> > Address: 65.19.161.25
>
> maybe it would be better to add local resolvers in the networks of the
> ISPs hosting those servers - those are "nearer" to the boxes and seems
> like a natural solution (just like we did for tribble/romulus)
>
>
> Stefan
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-12-12 20:33:29 Re: Online index builds
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-12-12 17:58:25 Re: [webmaster]