Re: SCRAM in the PG 10 release notes

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SCRAM in the PG 10 release notes
Date: 2017-09-22 12:54:02
Message-ID: 5ac598a1-bec3-e242-d89d-f78762350c5d@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 9/21/17 14:15, Jeff Janes wrote:
> This looks good to me.  Might suggest adding verifying the clients as a
> specific step:  
>
> "To upgrade an existing installation from md5 to scram-sha-256, verify
> that all client software supports it, set password_encryption =
> 'scram-sha-256' in postgresql.conf..."

I don't think there is a well-defined way of verifying whether all
client software supports it other than making the switch described and
then checking what breaks. So it's a bit of a circular process.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-09-22 12:56:39 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix bool/int type confusion
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-09-22 12:51:30 Re: [PATCH] Generic type subscripting