Re: Experiments with Postgres and SSL

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
To: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Andrey Borodin <amborodin86(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com>, Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Subject: Re: Experiments with Postgres and SSL
Date: 2024-02-28 12:10:20
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 28/02/2024 14:00, Matthias van de Meent wrote:
> I don't think I understand what you meant here, could you correct the
> sentence or expand why we want to do that?
> Note that with ALPN you could negotiate postgres/3.0 or postgres/4.0
> during the handshake, which could save round-trips.

Sorry, I missed "avoid" there. I meant:

I think we'd want to *avoid* changing the major protocol version in a
way that would introduce a new roundtrip, though.

Heikki Linnakangas
Neon (

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Rasheed 2024-02-28 12:11:02 Re: bug report: some issues about pg_15_stable(8fa4a1ac61189efffb8b851ee77e1bc87360c445)
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2024-02-28 12:05:32 Re: When extended query protocol ends?