| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
|---|---|
| To: | Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Andrey Borodin <amborodin86(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com>, Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Subject: | Re: Experiments with Postgres and SSL |
| Date: | 2024-02-28 12:10:20 |
| Message-ID: | 5abd2993-1bec-421e-9dea-7317222637af@iki.fi |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 28/02/2024 14:00, Matthias van de Meent wrote:
> I don't think I understand what you meant here, could you correct the
> sentence or expand why we want to do that?
> Note that with ALPN you could negotiate postgres/3.0 or postgres/4.0
> during the handshake, which could save round-trips.
Sorry, I missed "avoid" there. I meant:
I think we'd want to *avoid* changing the major protocol version in a
way that would introduce a new roundtrip, though.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
Neon (https://neon.tech)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dean Rasheed | 2024-02-28 12:11:02 | Re: bug report: some issues about pg_15_stable(8fa4a1ac61189efffb8b851ee77e1bc87360c445) |
| Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2024-02-28 12:05:32 | Re: When extended query protocol ends? |