Re: [PATCH] Allow Postgres to pick an unused port to listen

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Yurii Rashkovskii <yrashk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Cary Huang <cary(dot)huang(at)highgo(dot)ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow Postgres to pick an unused port to listen
Date: 2023-08-02 19:52:24
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 10 Jul 2023, at 14:27, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:

> This patch is Waiting on Author in the current commitfest with no new patch
> presented following the discussion here. Is there an update ready or should we
> close it in this CF in favour of a future one?

Since the thread stalled here with the patch waiting on author since May I will
go ahead and mark it returned with feedback in this CF. Please feel free to
re-open a new entry in a future CF.

Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-08-02 21:48:31 First draft of back-branch release notes is done
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2023-08-02 19:47:51 Re: An attempt to avoid locally-committed-but-not-replicated-to-standby-transactions in synchronous replication