Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Confused by result of pg_catalog.format_type()

From: Erik Jones <erik(at)myemma(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Confused by result of pg_catalog.format_type()
Date: 2008-04-25 00:45:14
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-general
On Apr 24, 2008, at 5:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

> Erik Jones <erik(at)myemma(dot)com> writes:
>> Ah, pg_catalog.format_type(prorettype, null) = '"trigger"', thanks.
> It's probably fair to ask what it is you want to accomplish here,
> because comparing format_type's output to a constant seems awfully
> fragile.  Aside from the quotes (which I believe 8.3 won't emit in
> this particular case) the output can vary depending on search_path
> and perhaps other factors.
> If you're trying to identify trigger functions I'd suggest
> 	where prorettype = 'pg_catalog.trigger'::pg_catalog.regtype
> as being the most bulletproof formulation, and probably faster too.

Ah, thank you for the advice!  I'm writing python unittest assertions  
for testing db state -- extremely useful for testing some custom  
client db tools I'm writing for partitioning and migrations (both data  
and schema).  I'd known about, and used, the regclass oid type, but  
had only learned about it from seeing someone else's example.  I  
should've read the chapter on system information function a little  
more thoroughly :)  My assertion methods are about to become a lot  

Erik Jones

DBA | Emma®
800.595.4401 or 615.292.5888
615.292.0777 (fax)

Emma helps organizations everywhere communicate & market in style.
Visit us online at

In response to

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-04-25 00:52:26
Subject: Re: query performance
Previous:From: Brian CoxDate: 2008-04-25 00:41:26
Subject: Re: query performance

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group