Re: Fix XML handling with DOCTYPE

From: Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Ryan Lambert <ryan(at)rustprooflabs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Fix XML handling with DOCTYPE
Date: 2019-04-01 22:09:38
Message-ID: 5CA28C22.6060308@anastigmatix.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 04/01/19 17:34, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I think there were some outright bugs in the docs, at least for
> XMLTABLE, that maybe we should backpatch. If you have the energy to
> cherry-pick a minimal doc update to 10/11, I offer to back-patch it.

I'll see what I can do. There's breathing room for that after the end of
the CF, right?

It seems to me that the conformance-appendix part is worth using,
along with all of the clarifications in datatype.sgml and func.sgml
except the ones clarifying fixed behavior, where the behavior fix
wasn't backpatched. That'll be where the cherry-picking effort lies.

Regards,
-Chap

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-04-01 22:14:46 Re: monitoring CREATE INDEX [CONCURRENTLY]
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-04-01 21:59:04 Re: CPU costs of random_zipfian in pgbench